Olba / Diocaesarea (Antiquity)

1. Location

Olba was an ancient city of Rough Cilicia. It was located close to the modern site of Uğara, almost 25 kilometers northeast from Seleuceia ad Calycandus (modern Silifke). In the 1st century the nearby sanctuary of Zeus Olbius evolved into a separate city under the name Diocaesareia. The location of the sanctuary and the new city has been identified with the modern village of Uzuncaburc, at a distance of 4 kilometres from Olba.

2. History

It has been suggested that Olba corresponds to the Hittite Ura (or Harrua or Hyria according to Stephanus Byzantius),1 capital of the land Pirindu,2 and one of the most important cities of southern Anatolia during the Bronze and Iron Age, the exact location of which has not been discovered.3

According to a mythical tradition, the city of Olba and and the neighbouring sanctuary dedicated to Zeus were founded by the hero Aias, son of Teukros, and like many Asia Minor cities it attributed its foundation to the emigration which followed the Trojan War.4

During the Hellenistic period, the city, the sanctuary of Zeus Olbius (who was identified with the local deity Tarhuunt5 in the framework of the religious syncretism), as well as the surrounding area were administered by local priests-kings, the Teucrids, under the Seleucid supremacy. The dynasty of the priests was maintained in power later on by Marcus Antonius6 and then Octavian Augustus, who thus maintained a control over the local populations of the area, namely the Kennatai and the Lallaseis.7 In the 1st century Marcus Antonius Polemo, possibly an heir of Aias, is referred as the dynast of the city according to numismatic evidence .8 During the 1st century the city lost its autonomy, due to the foundation of the province of Cilicia (72 A.D.), whereas the settlement of the sanctuary was separated from Olba and constituted a new city under the name Diocaesareia.9 During the Byzantine times the cities of Olba and Diocaesareia constituted bishoprics of Isauria.

3. Minting

The first bronze issues are dated to the 1st century B.C. and were maintained throughout the Imperial times by both cities. Among the iconographic types stands out Zeus Olbius, whereas frequent are the depictions of other deities worshipped in both cities, such as Hermes, Athena, Selene, Helios, Dionysus, Heracles, Dioscouroi, Nemesis and Sarapis. It is also worth noting that cities such as Diocaesareia, bear on the coins the title metropolis of the Kennatae.10

4. Topography – Buildings

4.1 Olba

The remains of ancient Olba are situated on a rocky hill, close to the modern settlement of Uğara. There are still visible some traces of the fortifications, the largest part of which is dated to the Hellenistic period; of particular interest are the surviving rectangular towers, which reinforced the walls' defense. Architectural remains of private houses of the Roman and Early Byzantine period were found on the hill's slopes. At the north part of the hill the arcade of an aqueduct were discovered, which supplied the city with water. According to epigraphic testimonies, the monument was built in the period of Septimius Severus and was funded by a certain Heracleides.11 To the west, below the hill, just at the city centre there was a small theater,12 as well as a monumental nymphaeum.13 These public buildings are dated to the 2nd and 3rd centuries respectively. A monumental colonnaded street facilitated the communication between the two cities, Olba and Diocaesareia. A necropolis with rock cut tombs as well as sarcophagi was found at the southern side of the hill. It is also worth mentioning a heroon, in the form of a small Corinthian prostyle tetrastyle temple, the remains of which are located at the southern part of the plain.14

4.2.Diocaesareia

The remains of the sanctuary of Zeus Olbius and of Diocaesareia were located between two hills in the area of the modern Turkish village of Uzuncaburç. The site experienced a magnificent building activity in the 1st century A.D., due to the foundation of the new city.

The sanctuary of Zeus Olbius was located in the city centre, on a low hill. An enclosure of ashlar masonry surrounded the rectangular complex, whereas on its eastern side it was closed by a portico, the erection of which is attributed to Seleucus I Nicator (306-281 B.C.). The temple of the sanctuary was of the Corinthian order (measuring 33.7 by 21.2 meters), peripteral with 6 by 12 columns. According to the stylistic features of its architectural forms it is dated to the 2nd quarter of the 2nd century B.C.15 It has been considered as one of the over-ambitious building projects of Antiochos IV Epiphanes (175-164 B.C.), who in the short period of his reign attempted to revive the prestige of the Seleucid kingdom and served his political interests through the foundation of lavish temples. The religious propaganda of the king focused on the cult of Zeus, whereas the selection of the Corinthian order apparently matched the preferences of a kingdom which was influenced by the oriental tradition. During the early Christian period the temple of Zeus Olbius was transformed into a three-aisled basilica.16

To the northwest of the sanctuary of Zeus, there was a temple dedicated to Tyche built around the second half of the 1st century A.D. It is a Corinthian-style temple elevated on a podium, the erection of which was funded by a certain Oppius, son of Obrimus, and his wife, according to the dedicatory inscription of the architrave.17

On a slope in the southeastern part of the city in the interior of the sanctuary complex there was the theatre, which is dated to the 2nd century A.D. It was a Roman-Asia Minor type theatre, oriented towards the south, which was divided horizontally by a broad corridor (diazoma, praesinctio) into two zones (maeniana).The lower section of seating (theatron, ima cavea-maenianum) was formed on the natural slope of the hill, whereas for the construction of the upper section of the seating area (summa cavea, epitheatron) and of the retaining walls (anallemata) there had to be made artificial substructures.18

The aqueduct bringing water into the city ended at the monumental nymphaeum in the form of an exedra, dated to the 3rd century A.D and situated on the Decumanus maximus.19 This central street heading from east to west was flanked by colonnades and led along the precinct of the sanctuary from the theater area to the temple of Tyche, whereas on the east of the temple it passed through monumental gate-buildings with Corinthian columns and lavish sculptural decoration.20 The other central street of the city, the cardo, headed from north to south and was 12.5 meters wide. It was also flanked by colonnades and led to a monumental Gate opening on the defense wall with three archways, dating from the 2nd century.21


The architectural remains of a rectangular building from the Imperial era at the south of the sanctuary have possibly been identified as the gymnasium of the city. Extremely interesting is the Hellenistic rectangular tower measuring 12.49 by 15.6 and 22.5 meters high spreading on six storeys. The tower was situated on the north side of the defensive wall. It is built with isodomic masonry. In the interior the three lower storeys are divided in five rooms each. A stone staircase facilitated access to the upper storeys whereas there were also small windows for allowing light in the interior. According to an inscription the tower was built by the priest Tarkyares, around the 2nd century B.C. From this Hellenistic tower comes the name of the modern Turkish village, namely Uzuncaburç, which means tall tower.22

Outside of the city walls, about 1 km to the south, there was discovered one more Hellenistic square tower, with a stepped pyramidal roof, which probably consisted the funerary monument of some priest.23 Also extra muros were discovered necropoleis of the Roman and Byzantine era with burial chambers and arcosolia.24



1. Steph.Byz, Ethn.s.v. “Hyria”.

2. Pirindu was the name of the western part of Cilicia, possibly Rough Cilicia. See Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), p. 2086. See also Neue Pauly, 8 (Stuttgart-Weimar 2000) s.v. “Olba”, p. 1158-1159 (F.Hild).

3. See Hellenkemper, H., Hild, F., Kilikien und Isaurien , TIB 5, (Wien 1990), p. 369. G. Lang, Klassische Antike Stätten Anatoliens  Bd II (Norderstedt 2003) p. 195, PECS s.v. „Olba“ p. 641, (T.S. Mackay); Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), p. 2086. A different view is expressed by R.H.Beal, who thinks that the port of Ura was possibly situated at the site Gilindere, close to Aydıncık. See Beal, R.H., “Ura: The location of Cilician Ura”, AS 42, 1992, pp. 65-74.

4. Strabo, 14.5.10. For that reason the local priest-kings of the city were called Teucrids, whereas the majority amongst them bore the name Ajax or Teucros. See RE 17.2 (1937), s.v. Olbe,. Cols 2399-2403. Williams, C.,”The Corinthian Temple of Zeus Olbios at Uzuncaburç: a reconsideration of the date”, AA 86, 1971, 37-54. Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2084, 2087, 2099.

5. God of the weather conditions. See Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2084, 2087, 2099.

6. Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), p. 2087-2089

7. These were local tribes who dwelled at the eastern part of Rough Cilicia. See Jones, A.H.M., Cities of the Eastern Roman Provinces (Oxford 1971), pp. 195, 209-210.

8. In detail about the high priest and dynast M.Antonius Polemo and the issue of his correlation with the king of Pontus Polemo II see Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2092-2095.

9. The foundation of Diocaesareia and its distinction from Olba is attributed possibly to the emperor Tiberius (14-37), although according to some scholars it was either Vespasian (69-79) or Domitian (81-96) who were actually responsible for the creation of the new city. For this issue see Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2087-2089. See also Kristen, E., “Diocaesareia und Sebaste”, AAWW 110, 1973, pp. 355-359. Lang, G., Klassische Antike Stätten Anatoliens (Norderstedt 2003), p. 196; Hotz, W., Die Mittelmeerküste Anatoliens (Darmstadt 1989), p. 91.

10. Furthermore they bear the honorary title Hadriane, whereas Olbe alone bears the title Antoniane. See in detail on the coins of the two cities and the conclusions on the cults of specific deities, Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2099-2103; Lang, G., Klassische Antike Stätten Anatoliens (Norderstedt 2003), p. 193-195; RE 17.2 (1937), s.v. Olbe, cols. 2399-2403 (W.Ruge).

11. Hellenkemper, H. –Hild, F., Kilikien und Isaurien,TIB 5 (1990), p. 370; Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2097, fn.196.

12. The theatre has not been excavated. See Ciancio Rossetto, P., Pisani Sartorio, G. (eds), Teatri Greci alle Origini del Linguaggio rappresentato, III (Roma 1994/5/6), p. 517; Sear, F., Roman Teatres, An architectural study (Oxford 2006), p. 362.

13. In detail the architecture of the Nymphaeum of Olba see Dorl-Klingenschmidt, C., Prunkbrunnen in kleinasiatischen Städten Funktion im Kontext (München 2001), p. 251-252, n. 118.

14. PECS, s.v. Olba, p. 641 (T.S.MacKay)

15. Earlier it was broadly accepted that the temple had been founded by Seleucus Nicator at the beginning of the 3rd century B.C. The new dating of the temple, argued for by Börker, C. and Williams, C., “Die Datierung des Zeus-Tempels von Olba-Diokaisareia in Kilikien”, AA 86, 1971, p. 37-54; Williams, C., “The Corinthian Temple of Zeus Olbios at Uzuncaburç: a Reconsideration of the Date”, AJA 78, 1974, p. 405-414.

16. For the transformation of the temple into a Christian basilica see Hellenkemper, H. –Hild, F., Kilikien und Isaurien, TIB 5 (1990), p. 240.

17. For the temple of Fortuna see Mackay, T.S., “The major sanctuaries of Pamphylia and Cilicia”, ANRW II.18.3 (Berlin 1990), pp. 2096, fn. 190; Akurgal, E., Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Tuekry (Istanbul 1978), p. 343; For the architrave inscription see Lang, G., Klassische Antike Stätten Anatoliens (Norderstedt 2003), p. 196.

18. Very few traces of the concentric vaulted corridor have been preserved till today on the western lower part of the cavea. See Ciancio Rossetto, P., Pisani Sartorio, G. (eds), Teatri Greci alle Origini del Linguaggio rappresentato, III (Roma 1994/5/6), p. 522; Sear, F., Roman Teatres, An architectural study (Oxford 2006), p. 361.

19. It is a nymphaeum decorated like the scaena frons of a theatre, which belongs to the type of Sigmoid shaped nymphaea. See in detail on the architecture of the nymphaeum of Diocaesareia, Dorl-Klingenschmidt, C., Prunkbrunnen in kleinasiatischen Städten Funktion im Kontext (München 2001), p. 179, n. 14.

20. Akurgal, E., Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Turkey (Istanbul 1978), p. 343.

21. According to epigraphic evidence this gate was restored at the end of the 4th-beginning of the 5th century. See Hellenkemper, H. –Hild, F., Kilikien und Isaurien, TIB 5 (1990), p. 240.

22. Regarding the identification of the building it has been suggested that it was the house of the high priest, whereas other scholars think of it as a funerary monument. The issue of the dating of the tower is also left open; see McNicoll, A.W., Hellenistic Fortifications from the Aegean to the Euphrates (Oxford 1997), p. 178-181.

23. PECS, s.v. Diocaesareia p. 276 (T.S.MacKay), Lang, G., Klassische Antike Stätten Anatoliens (Norderstedt 2003), p. 197.

24. Hellenkemper, H. –Hild, F., Kilikien und Isaurien, TIB 5 (1990), p. 240; Heberdey, R. –Wilhelm, A., Reisen in Kilikien (Denkmäler ÖAW phil-hist. Klasse 44, Wien 1896), p. 88.