Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη ΙΔΡΥΜΑ ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ
z
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Αναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΑΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΒΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΓΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΔΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΕΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΖΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΗΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΘΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΙΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΚΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΛΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΜΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΝΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΞΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΟΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΠΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΡΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΣΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΤΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΥΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΦΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΧΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα ΨΑναζήτηση με το γράμμα Ω

Palace of Boukoleon

Συγγραφή : Karakatsanis Dimitris (11/7/2008)
Μετάφραση : Loumakis Spyridon

Για παραπομπή: Karakatsanis Dimitris , "Palace of Boukoleon",
Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Κωνσταντινούπολη
URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=11751>

Παλάτι Βουκολέοντος (28/12/2009 v.1) Palace of Boukoleon (28/3/2010 v.1) 
 

1. Introduction

1.1. Location and etymology of the name of the palace of Boukoleon

The palace of Boukoleon was lying at Constantinople, on the seashore of the Sea of Marmara, south of the Great Palace, east of the church of Saints Sergios and Bakchos1 (fig. 1, 11).2 Later, under Nikephoros II Phokas (963-969), the palace of Boukoleon incorporated a part of the Great Palace.3 Its name is connected with a marble stone composition that was situated on the dock of the harbor and depicted an ox (=gr. bous) and a lion (=gr. leon).4

1.2. History of the research

The first foundations of a systematic research for this monument were laid during the last decades of the 19th century. Paspates, within the framework of a research of Constantinople’s topography and especially of the palaces, he was referred to the palace of Boukoleon.5 Later, Millingen studied the palace by combining the written sources with the observations of previous scholars.6 In 1934 followed the study of Mamboury and Wiegand that was based on surviving archaeological remains and produced a great number of ground-plans, photographs as well as hypothetical reconstructions.7 Afterwards, Guilland published a series of articles based mainly on the sources8, while Müller–Wiener speaking about the topography of Constantinople made more mention of the history of the monument.9 Finally Mango tried to locate the boundaries of the palace through the archaeological remains.10

1.3. Sources

It is not until 800 that the name Boukoleon was attested in the written sources for the first time (ἐπὶ τὸν Βουκολέοντα καὶ τὴν Σιδηρᾶν διαβιβάσας).11 Kinnamos12 and Leo Grammatikos13 report that its western part functioned as prison while Patria of Constantinople designate the location of the palace and discern it from the palace of Hormisdas.14 The texts of the 9th and the 10th century are referring to the shore and the harbor under this name, while occasionally to the balcony of the palace as well, looking out to the harbor.15 Finally, Anna Komnene in Alexiad identifies the name of Boukoleon with the palace lying above (τὸ ὑπερκείμενον παλάτιον).16

2. Architectural phases of the palace

From the present form of the imperial complex few parts of its internal areas are preserved, thus making difficult the reconstruction of its ground-plan. More precisely, above the foundations and within the remains was opened a railway (1871) connecting Constantinople with Europe (fig. 2).17 In a parallel manner, its seaward side was raised to the ground and now a road of wide circulation that runs around the whole seawall of the Sea of Marmara, crosses through. Nevertheless, Guilland believes that only the upper store of the palace was habitable and functioned as a mansion, while the lower part was used as barracks or encampment for sailors.18

The first building phase of the complex is attributed to the emperor Theodosios II (408-450)19 and someone must look for it all along the walls of the shore of Marmara, from the gate of lions (Catladikapı) until the place where Nea Ekklesia was erected.20 The fragmentary archaeological remains, however, can not be of any help to this identification.21

A first rebuilding of the palace took place during the reign of Theophilos (829-843). Later, the emperor Nikephoros II Phokas (963-969) planed the erection of new walls. This contributed to the destruction of many buildings, to the transformation of the Great Palace to a fortress-citadel, as well as to the integration of a part of the Great Palace within the palace of Boukoleon.22 This conclusion is based on the text of Nikolaos Mesarites as well as on archaeological evidence such as the preservation of the walls on the location Kapı ağası camii23 and on the western perimeter of the palace24 (fig. 3-4).25

During the late Byzantine period, the palace was abandoned by the Palaiologoi and was turned into prison. Later, in the first ottoman centuries in this place was built a quarter.26

Based on archaeological remains and the drawings we can partly reconstruct the façade of the palace. More precisely, the upper part of the façade of the west side, until the year 1871, according to the drawings of Choisuel Gouffier, was ornated with a blind arcade, at the edge of which there were marble lions27 [9th century- fig. 5)]. The lions are now kept in the Archaeological Museum of Constantinople.28 A little further to the east there was a small gateway that secured the access to the palace (fig. 6).29 On the eastern side of the imperial staircase for disembarking, beneath the palace of Boukoleon, a trapezoid cistern was found with six columns30 (fig. 7). Finally, its eastern wing was constituted by continuous halls overlooking the sea and lighted by wide windows with marble window-frames, whereas there were balconies rested on consoles. Inside the palace were preserved in fragments the cross-vaults.31 (fig. 8)

3. Sculptured decoration

The only sculptured decoration still preserved is that of the column capitals of the cistern. These column capitals are of the ionic order with dosseret and have upon their narrow side the symbol of the cross (fig. 7). They are dated to the 6th century.32

1. Γούναρης, Γ., Εισαγωγή στην Παλαιοχριστιανική Αρχαιολογία (Thessaloniki 1999), p. 187.

2. Müller-Wiener, W., Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls (Tübingen 1977), p. 226, fig. 258.

3. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), p. 42.

4. Kazhdan, A., "Boukoleon", The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium Ι , Kazhdan, A. (ed.) (Oxford - New York 1991), p. 317.

5. Πασπάτης, Α., Τα Βυζαντινά Ανάκτορα και τα πέριξ αυτών Ιδρύματα. Μεθ' ̓ενός χάρτου τοπογραφικού (Athens 1885), pp. 301-305.

6. Van Millingen, A., Byzantine Constantinople. The Walls of the City and the Adjoining Historical Sites (London 1899), pp. 278-287.

7. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), pp. 1-25.

8. Guilland, R., “Constantinople byzantine : le Boucoléon, la plage du Boucoléon”, Byzantinoslavica 10 (1949), pp. 16-27; Guilland, R., “Le Palais du Boukoléon,” Byzantinoslavica 11 (1950) pp. 61-71; ibid., “Le Port palatin du Boukoléon,” Byzantinoslavica 11 (1950), pp. 187-206; ibid., “Le palais d'Hormisdas” Byzantinoslavica 12 (1951), pp. 210-237; ibid., "Le palais du Boukoléon. L'assassinat de Nicéphore II Phokas", Byzantinoslavica 13 (1952), pp. 101-136.

9. Müller-Wiener, W., Bildlexikon Zur Topographie Istanbuls (Tübingen 1977), pp. 225-228.

10. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), pp. 41-50.

11. Halkin, F., Euphémie de Chalcédoine: legendes byzantins (Subsidia hagiographica 41, Bruxelles 1965), p. 89.

12. Ιωάννης Κίνναμος, Επιτομή,  Meineke, A. (ed.), Ioannis Cinnami epitomae rerum ad Ioanne et Alexio Comnenis gestarum (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonnae 1836), p. 233.20-22.

13. Λέων Γραμματικός, Χρονογραφία, Bekker, Ι. (ed.), Leonis Grammatici Chronographia (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae, Bonnae 1842), p. 227.20-23.

14. Πάτρια Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, Περί κτισμάτων, Preger, Τh. (ed.), Scriptores Originum Constantinoupolitanarum (Lipsiae 1907), p. 256, ch. 126.

15. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), p. 41.

16. Άννα Κομνηνή, Αλεξιάς, Reinsch, D. and Kambylis, A. (eds.), Annae Comnenae, Alexias (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, 40, 1, Berlin 2001), p. 89.65-68.

17. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), pl. 40.

18. Guilland, R., “Le Palais du Boukoléon,” Byzantinoslavica 11 (1950), p. 65.

19. Müller-Wiener, W., Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls (Tübingen 1977), p. 225.

20. Guilland, R., “Le Palais du Boukoléon,” Byzantinoslavica 11 (1950), p. 62.

21. Γούναρης, Γ., Εισαγωγή στην Παλαιοχριστιανική Αρχαιολογία (Thessaloniki 1999), p. 188.

22. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), p. 42.

23. Ottoman building erected on the area of the Great Palace.

24. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), pp. 43-45. The buildings that are included in the palace of Boukoleon according to Mango were the tower Kentenarion, the gate Skyla, Chrysotriklinos, Mouchroutas, the chapels of Theotokos and of the prophet Elijah as well as Manuelites.

25. Mango, C., “The Palace of the Boukoleon,” Cahiers Archéologiques 45 (1997), p. 42, fig. 2 and p. 45, fig. 5 respectively.

26. Müller-Wiener, W., Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls (Tübingen 1977), p. 227.

27. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), p. 4, pl. 11.

28. Mango, C., “Constantinopolitana,” Studies on Constantinople (London 1993), pp. 318-319.

29. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), p. 6, pl. 15.

30. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), p. 15, pl. 25.

31. Mamboury, E., Wiengand, T., Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom une Marmara-meer (Berlin - Leipzig 1934), pp. 13-14, pl. 29.

32. Kautzsch, R., Kapitellstudien (Berlin - Leipzig 1934) p. 175.

     
 
 
 
 
 

Δελτίο λήμματος

 
press image to open photo library
 

>>>